Author Topic: Monkey See...Monkey Do...or Do We?  (Read 437 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

mardee

  • Probationer
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Monkey See...Monkey Do...or Do We?
« on: May 04, 2011, 07:55:27 PM »
Bandura’s Observational Learning concept is brilliant. When we look at Bandura's observational of learning and how it's influenced, we see four variables. There is the Attentional processes, which determines what we can and do attend to. We have The Retentional processes, which this tells us how we remember what we saw. We have The Motor reproduction processes, this tells us how we act out what we remember seeing. Lastly, we have The Motivational processes, which determine the circumstances under which learning is translated into performance. (Hergenhahn & Olson, 2007, p. 355).

Why might these learning concepts be important to consider with the content of television programs, the internet, films, video games and the various forms of “new media?” Well, here are some facts which I researched to show exactly how important this impact has on someone's life. The main focus on my research was the influence of media to adolescents. Recent studies have shown violent media exposed to adolescents who engage in the act of acting out aggressive behavior in a video game leads to aggression after the game completed. Adolescents who actively engage in violent video games show more signs of aggression than if they did not engage in violent video games. Our text books say reinforcement is not dependent on learning. I happen to disagree with this. People will often learn more and retain more information and even act our behavior more if there is a positive reinforcement associated with it.

Some people use aggression as a form of gaining a reward for their behavior. When a person imitates a certain behavior of aggression and they get rewarded for it, chances are they will continue that behavior to gain the reward again. Take terrorists for example, when they threaten us, we (the media) “reward” them by giving them highly publicized awareness of them. “Television programs, acts of assault have outnumbered affectionate acts four to nine” (Myers, 2010, p. 377). This is due in partly because children do what they see and learn.

My question is...if all of this is true (which I believe it to be based on my research) then how do we explain the shootings at Columbine High school? These kids who did this mass murdering came from a very well established home. Yet, “on April 20, 1999, during which they killed 13 people and injured more than 20. With a geophysicist for a father and a mother who worked with the disabled. His family was upper middle class; his father had a successful mortgage business.”(A&E Television, 2000)

Reference

A&E Television, Initials. (2000). Crime files. Retrieved from biography.com/notorious/crimefiles.do?catId=259458&action=view&profileId=260623

Hergenhahn, B.R., & Olson, M.H. (2007). Theories of Personality (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.

matas

  • Probationer
  • *
  • Posts: 5
    • View Profile
Re: Monkey See...Monkey Do...or Do We?
« Reply #1 on: May 04, 2011, 11:00:54 PM »
Good question, although Terrorists are controversial because of conspiracy theories, but the Columbine shooting is a good example...

sakoz

  • zelator
  • **
  • Posts: 618
    • View Profile
Re: Monkey See...Monkey Do...or Do We?
« Reply #2 on: May 05, 2011, 06:16:45 PM »
mardee; Your question, how we explain rampage shootings?( I'll 'field' that in general rather than a specific instance.)
By explaining the upbringing in your specific example; middle class, law abiding parents etc. You reveal your unspoken belief that we are the product of our environment/upbringing.
No wonder your 'baffled', their anti social behavior does not fit your "frame of reference'. You leave out our ability to think and believe the thoughts we think, even false ones.
Our involuntary reacts to BELIEVED thoughts,(no matter how erroneous some are). So if someone hates 'society', how do they hurt "society"; (a abstraction)? What image do they have/make for 'society'. Individuals, of course.
So in their mind hurting/killing individuals (they each represent 'society') they are retaliating/revenging for what they believe was inflicted on them, real or imagined.

mardee

  • Probationer
  • *
  • Posts: 4
    • View Profile
Re: Monkey See...Monkey Do...or Do We?
« Reply #3 on: May 05, 2011, 06:47:51 PM »
I agree with you sakoz. We can become a product our environment or we chose not to be a product of our environment. Based on this story I posted about the shootings at Columbine High school, it's obvious these kids did not choose to become a product of their family environment. It appears to me, they chose a family who was more acceptable to their environment. Could it be their parents were so absentee they failed to see the signs of their children which led up to this occurrence? I am in high doubt people who commit crimes or really any crimes do not have some sort of trail behind them. There has got to be some sort of clues these people leave that leads up to a crime. People just don't kill on the spare of the moment...do they?

sakoz

  • zelator
  • **
  • Posts: 618
    • View Profile
Re: Monkey See...Monkey Do...or Do We?
« Reply #4 on: May 05, 2011, 09:07:19 PM »
mardee; our 'primal' involuntary reacts to our believed-thought-images; as it does to empirical perceptions. (Think of a image that disturbs you.)
Our involuntary is 'hard-wired' to react to perceptions for our safety and survival. When our involuntary evolved, there was no allowance made for when language would be 'made'; that by believing some images are real gives us the ability to "counterfeit" perceptions. The 'problem' is we "unwittingly" believe instead of consciously choosing what we want our involuntary to do for us by reacting to our "tailor made" images. Recognizing this is the next step in evolution or next major paradigm shift.
Our ancestors did not recognize the responsibility and liability of using language. By believing some images are real, IS IN EFFECT, ordering our involuntary to react to them. Few people realize that yet.
« Last Edit: May 05, 2011, 09:21:05 PM by sakoz »

 


enter