Placebo Effect Demonstrates Therapeutic Use of 'Believing'

[sakoz]

What was said about a mustard seed?  'Believing' is a invisible process, recognized by its effects; like gravity and magnetic fields. 'Believing' requires a image to access the process; just as we can't see gravity per se unless something is falling. We see 'effects'.  A false/fake pill or false thought can be used to 'set believing in motion'.
Unwittingly believing false thoughts is well known for causing the effects of emotional suffering, dysfunctional behavior, mistakes, stress, psychosomatics, etc. Pretty powerful  invisible process.
Want to consciously use 'believing' therapeuticaly? I have the ideal image to use to initiate believing on your behalf. Think of the evolutionary impulse in us. We know the 'track record' of evolution.
So use it for healing, both physical and psychological.  What if it does not exist? No problem, the fake pill was not medicine but 'believing' worked anyway; nonetheless. Believing 'believing' is the ultimate healing process. ( Ask your doctor what percent of the pills he prescribes are 'placebos'; I heard 30%, anyone care to verify that?)
The images used to activate 'believing' is variable, it's the 'believing' that's constant from one person to another.
We know 'believing' does not change inert pills into medicine. Then isn't it hypocritical to believe we can 'believ'e thought into matter but not inert pills into medicine? We can 'mistakenly believe' inert pills are medicine but that does not make it so, but believing makes it appear so and so the effect that it seems so. We react to beliefs; true or false. The ABC of Emotions demonstrates that B is our version of Pavlovs bell, we react to beliefs the way Pavlovs dogs reacted to his bell sound. "Without 'believing', thoughts are inert." What does that statement imply? The hidden/implicit/unrecognized belief that believing thoughts are real 'makes' them real. If that were so, then why don't the inert pills become real? Yet we believe believing thoughts are real makes it so,as if believing transforms thoughts into empirical, factual, real substance. We act/react to believed thoughts as if they morphed. We believe metamorphosis of thoughts analogous to tadpoles into frogs, caterpillers into butterflys.
Laws are constant, not selective, random, intermittent. Is 'believing' as consistent as gravity or not? What do 'you' think?