What We Do With Language (and vice versa)

[sakoz]

I'm writing language; your reading language. We use language as catalyst to act and react to. 'Believing'  consists of language. Is there non-verbal 'believing'? If so, non-verbal believing is conveyed via language. Is language required to 'believe'?  "Believing" and how we use 'believing'; implies our "fate" is internally determined more than we ever dreamed. etc.

"Blind Spot" defined as "something or function not seen or acknowledged even though present."
Do you lack recognition/acknowledgement of the submicroscopic level referred to as 'Brownian Movement"? There's no significant consequences if you lack recognition of quantum level.
Do you lack recognition/acknowledgement of the role of 'believed thoughts' in your experience? There 'are' very significant consequences of not recognizing/acknowledging when you believe a thought image is real. Those unrecognized 'believed images' evoke involuntary reactions just as well as 'empirical perceptions' do to cause experience.
Is it efficacious to not recognize believing false thoughts or is it a liability?  Depends on the content of the belief; placebo effects can be beneficial; psychosomatic symptoms, emotional suffering, dysfunctional behavior, mistakes are not; those are 'nocebo effects'.  Choose.
We believe both true and false thoughts. If 'believing' is indoctrinated/conditioned into our unconscious then we can learn to regulate 'believing' rather than be victims of habit-believing.
I'm not implying Utopia or  panacea but simply the cessation of 'unrecognized conditioning caused' emotional suffering and or dysfunctional behavior. I will 'promise' that you won't need therapy, because 'unrecognized beliefs' are the common denominator of all human emotional suffering and dyfunctional behavior and common daily unpleasant emotions as well.