There is widespread depression among college students:
http://huhs.harvard.edu/NewsAndEvents/News/Article.aspx?id=200009 "Chances are almost one in two that a college student will become
depressed to the point of being unable to function"
Scientists are generally adverse to knowledge about freedom:
http://www.human-nature.com/nibbs/03/dcdennett.html "there can be no such thing as free will for the committed scientist,
in his or her professional life"
In my opinion these two facts are related.
Basically we all know how freedom works on a practical level, we don't
have a problem to talk in terms of choosing in daily life. But on an
intellectual level free will is a heavily contested, and heavily
doubted issue. So what I think is happening at colleges is that there
is much pressure on this practical knowledge from an intellectual
level, leading to destruction and mangling of the practical knowledge
of freedom that students have. And to have this bad knowledge about
freedom that is pressured and shallow, occasions psychological
problems much peculiar to college students.
When you ask people how choosing works you generally get two kinds of
answers.
1. choosing is forced
Here choosing is defined in terms of calculating an optimum from a set
of values. So the result is forced by the calculation. The choice can
only turn out the optimal way, not any other way. For example a
chesscomputer calculates the move with the highest chance of winning.
Selecting the best move in stead of the others is called choosing.
2. choosing is free
Here choosing is defined in terms of things turning out one way or
another. The alternatives are in the future, and one or the other is
realized. The act of realizing an alternative is called choosing. What
does the job of realizing an alternative in a choice can only be known
to exist by deciding it is there (love, hate etc.), not by measuring.
The first is the intellectual concept of choosing, the second is the
practical daily life concept of choosing. So what do you get when
number 1 intellect encroaches on number 2 practical?
The result is that the opinion of what is good and bad becomes
objectified (like the objective goal of winning the chessgame). The
spiritual process of deciding what is good and bad freely is replaced
with calculations with a forced result.
So the link to emotions is lost, there is only a link to an objective
goal. The students become tortured with all kinds of objective
criteria for beauty, objective criteria for doing well at college etc.
and they fail to develop subjective opinions about those things
because they misconceive freedom.
Mohammad Nur Syamsu