... edited for brevity...
i am intrigued by this statement. described yourself as a "martial artist" only for lack o f a better term. and to say it is active and UNCOOPERATIVE. this is an interesting description.
i wonder if it the participents that are uncooperative, or the style. Ok, come on, put me out of my misery.
Always put "martial artist" in quotes because there's lots of discussion about what exactly that is, the ideas it invokes. Even "self defense" is oft frowned upon in some of the circles I train, because they don't like the idea of being on the defense, and prefer the term "self-preservation".
The idea of non-cooperation is hugely important. For safety, people should train with some level of cooperation (for instance, only using 90% of one's speed and 90% of one's power, or better yet, "progressive resistance"). Even contests (already a questionable term) like Vale Tudo (which means "no rules") and the UFC have rules, but give the impression they do not. This is relevant 'cuz rules=cooperation.
Making matters worse, most "styles" teach techniques, which by definition, require a lot of cooperation to "get". That'd be fine, if they also pressure-tested the material, which most don't. If they do, they don't train with/without tools (weapons), multiple opponents, unpredictable environs and etc.
Most types of assaults, criminal, domestic, other "disputes", are extremely chaotic. Currently, the best example of people training for such are here:
http://www.dogbrothersvideo.com/promo01.wmvThe people I train with, all train essentially the same "style" as the guys above. Most of us don't fight at The Gathering (where the link takes you), but we do spar uncooperatively, with and without tools, in the same manner. Just a bit more padding (thicker gloves, more serious head protection). We do train against multiple opponents, unequal initiative (where one starts in a non-dominant position, or by surprise attack), unequal armament (against multiple "opponents", they have a tool and you don't), and uncooperative environs (obstacles, minimal/no exits and such).
"Opponent" is a word I also put in quotes, mostly for philosophical reasons. Certainly won't bore you with those, even after an already retina-burning, yawn inducing post.