Last advice,
makes me wonder if women are that superficial to fall for the sweetener?
Which is all it is.
Horton
Has a woman (or man, I suppose, these days) ever told you you were the most amazing person she's ever slept with, or that you just have the most amazing penis? If someone has, you probably know that feels pretty good - even if you may suspect it's not
strictly true. If noone has, just think about how you feelf when a beautiful girl/handsome boy simply smiles at you: good.
I believe, though it's only a hunch, that this "shortcut to sexual attraction" is crucial to human mate selection. In other species, complexity is comparably limited and sexual/natural selection are most often highly correlated (i.e., a trait that confers a natural advantage is extremely likely to also confer a sexual advantage). However, in humans, complexity is virtually infinite and this correlation is now virtually non-existent, making it almost impossible or at least highly impractical to correctly deduce a mate's genetic worth based simply on day to day interaction (see: amount of failed marriages and single mothers).
I believe these shortcuts ensure that our complex personalities do not interface with macro-level propagation of our species by allowing people to experience sufficiently strong sexual attraction for
long enough to propagate their genes, but not necessarily
slow enough to ensure that the mate really is the best possible choice. Presumably, humans who lacked this ability to lose themselves in pillow talk never had as many children as the peope who do, while the complexity of their personalities remained largely intact, thus conferring no inherent evolutionary disadvantage - but again, pure speculation on my part.